Cases 1 - 9 of 9
STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. COASTAL NINGBO HARDWARE MANUFACTURING CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2018cv01035
Defendant:
SCHUBERT PLUMBING & HEATING CO., INC., FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. and COASTAL NINGBO HARDWARE MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.
Plaintiff:
STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
PANSINI et al v. THE TRANE COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv03948
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL O. PANSINI and ELISA PANSINI
Defendant:
THE TRANE COMPANY , INGERSOLL RAND , FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOLDBERG et al v. SAPA EXTRUSIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01996
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER GOLDBERG and SETH GOLDBERG
Defendant:
SAPA EXTRUSIONS, INC. and FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HARTSFIELD et al v. ALBAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv61096
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK B HARTSFIELD, FREDERICK B HARTSFIELD, FREDERICK B HARTSFIELD and others
Defendant:
ALBAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY, BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
