Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Anabella Nguyen et al v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv06706
Plaintiff:
Anabella Nguyen and Tim Nguyen
Defendant:
Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and First Databank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Exeltis USA, Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00338
Petitioner:
Avion Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Plaintiff:
Exeltis USA, Inc.
Defendant:
First Databank, Inc.
Exeltis USA, Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.
as 1:2018mi00135
Petitioner:
Avion Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Plaintiff:
Exeltis USA, Inc.
Defendant:
First Databank, Inc.
Genus Lifesciences Inc. v. Lannett Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv07603
Defendant:
Cody Laboratories, Inc., First Databank, Inc. and Lannett Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Genus Lifesciences Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Alfasigma USA, Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.
as 4:2018cv06924
Plaintiff:
Alfasigma USA, Inc.
Defendant:
First Databank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Avion Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. First Databank, Inc.
as 4:2018cv04224
Defendant:
First Databank, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Avion Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA LLC v. CLINICAL DRUG INFORMATION, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv08235
Plaintiff:
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Defendant:
CLINICAL DRUG INFORMATION, LLC, ELSEVIER INC., FIRST DATABANK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Exeltis USA Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.
as 4:2017cv04810
Defendant:
First Databank, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Exeltis USA Inc.
First DataBank, Inc. v. USDC-CAOAK
as 18-70859
:
In re: FIRST DATABANK, INC.
Petitioner:
FIRST DATABANK, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
EXELTIS USA, INC.
Mission Pharmacal Company v. First DataBank, Inc.
as TXW/5:18-cv-00244
Plaintiff:
Mission Pharmacal Company
Defendant:
First DataBank, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
