Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Roemer v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State University et al
as 2:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Gary Roemer
Defendant:
Board of Regents of New Mexico State University, Dan Arvizu, Laura Castille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Flores
as 2:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sentry Select Insurance Company
Defendant:
Patricia Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Flores v. Lubbock County Jail
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rene Flores
Defendant:
Lubbock County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Fiye et al
as 2:2021cv01166
Plaintiff:
Joseph Flores
Defendant:
FNU Fiye, FNU Bucyaloo, FNU Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 2:2021cv00985
Plaintiff:
Davis Eddie Wilson
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque, Frank Flores, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dimas v. Pecos Independent School District Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv00978
Plaintiff:
De Anza Angel Dimas
Defendant:
Pecos Independent School District Board of Education, Pecos High School, Michael Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Ortiz et al
as 2:2021cv00833
Plaintiff:
Forrest Evans
Defendant:
Alicia Ortiz, Marta Flores, Margaret Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynn v. Flores et al
as 1:2021cv00193
Defendant:
Martin Romero, Elijah Romero, Yvette Hern and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Preston Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Bourne et al
as 1:2020cv01028
Petitioner:
Dan Flores
Respondent:
Robin Bourne, State of New Mexico and John Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2020cv01027
Respondent:
Robin Bourne, John Sanchez and State of New Mexico
Defendant:
Dan Flores
Plaintiff:
Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
