Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Crow v. Defuco et al
as 1:2021cv02289
Plaintiff:
Bradley E. Crow
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Colorado Time Comp Administrator, Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow v. Colorado Time Comp et al
as 1:2021cv01417
Defendant:
Lopez, Procter, Florez and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley E. Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffschneider v. Marshall et al
as 1:2020cv03018
Defendant:
Lennart (I) Abel, Jill Marshall, Rebecca Hearst and others
Plaintiff:
David Hoffschneider
Burkhart v. Florez et al
as 1:2020cv00732
Plaintiff:
David Lee Burkhart and Lacy Lee Burkhart
Defendant:
Moore, Siobhan (I) Burtlow, Florez (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoades v. Dauffenbauch et al
as 1:2019cv02445
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, James Moore, Scott Dauffenbauch and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ochoa Vasquez et al v. Marquez Masonry, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02803
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Urquidi Florez, Raul Ochoa Vasquez, Jose Carlos Ruiz Mejia and others
Defendant:
Marquez Masonry, LLC, Fernando Marquez-Servin and Marquez Masonry, LLC doing business as Marquez Masonry Construction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Crow et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01196
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark, Kevin Felker, Martha Krietemeyer and others
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment CO, National Foam Inc., UTC FIre & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vidmar, Jr. v. Florez
as 1:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Johnn A. Vidmar, Jr.
Defendant:
Florez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidmar, Jr. v. Florez
as 1:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
Johnn A. Vidmar, Jr.
Defendant:
Florez, Corporation of America and Crowley Correction Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longoria v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) et al
as 1:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Longoria
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Lucero , Lucero (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
