Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
KHALIL v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY
as 4:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
RAFAAT KHALIL
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tasha Royster v. Larry Robinson, et al
as 20-14877
Defendant / Appellee:
KELVIN LAWSON, in his official capacity as Chairman Florida A&M University, ELMIRA MANGUM, in her individual capacity, LARRY ROBINSON, in his official capacity as President Florida A&M University and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TASHA ROYSTER
WINEGLASS v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY
as 4:2020cv00129
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
Annarene F Wineglass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ROYSTER v. ROBINSON et al
as 4:2019cv00517
Plaintiff:
TASHA ROYSTER
Defendant:
JIMMY MILLER, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, ELMIRA MANGUM, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, LARRY ROBINSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT, FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
