Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Brandon Afoa v. China Airlines, Ltd., et al
as 19-35626
Defendant / Appellee:
HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation, CHINA AIRLINES, LTD., a foreign corporation, BRITISH AIRWAYS, PLC, a foreign corporation and others
Defendant:
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP., an Illinois corporation, DBA JBT Corporation, PNEUMO ABEX, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, TLD AMERICA CORP., a New York Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON APELA AFOA, an individual
Webb v. EE3, et al
as 19-1141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
EE3 and FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Balderas v. FMC Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2018cv04796
Plaintiff:
Daniel Balderas
Defendant:
FMC Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FMC Technologies, Inc v. OneSubsea IP UK Limited et al
as 4:2018cv02459
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, OneSubsea UK Limited, ONESUBSEA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FMC Technologies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bharat Forge Ltd. v. FMC Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03448
Plaintiff:
Bharat Forge Ltd.
Defendant:
FMC Technologies, Inc. and TechnipFMC, plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
