Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Phillips v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Tyler S. Phillips
Defendant:
FNU Gallegos and Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw et al v. City of Clovis et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Shaw and All inmates at the Curry County Detention Center et al.
Defendant:
City of Clovis, Curry County Adult Detention Center and FNU Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirven v. Curry County Detention Center, et al
as 21-2008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOYDALE KIRVEN
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU GALLEGOS, Warden, FNU KOCH, Sgt., FNU BRAMHILL, Officer and others
Kirven v. Curry County Detention Center et al
as 2:2020cv00568
Defendant:
FNU Bramhill, FNU Gallegos, FNU Koch and others
Plaintiff:
Loydale Kirven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirven v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
Loydale Kirven
Defendant:
FNU Gallegos, FNU Hayes, FNU Wornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. Valle et al
as 2:2019cv00797
Defendant:
FNU Valle, D Perez, Management and Training Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollison et al v. Curry County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv01061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown, David McDaniel, Loydale Kirven and others
Defendant:
FNU Gallegos, Curry County Detention Center, Trinity Food Groups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dibrell v. Philip et al
as 1:2018cv00278
Defendant:
Officer FNU Barajas, Lt FNU Fenny, Sgt FNU Gallegos and others
Plaintiff:
Erwin Dibrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carabajal v. Aragon et al
as 2:2016cv00890
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Carabajal
Defendant:
FNU Aragon, E. Bravo, R. Ulibarri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pimental v. Granadino et al
as 1:2016cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jose Magdaleno Pimental
Defendant:
Michael Granadino, FNU Montano, FNU Brea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
