Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MacWilliams v. Cooke et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jessie MacWilliams
Defendant:
Officer FNU Cooke, S.E.R.T. Officer FNU Rios and Officer on 3rd Shift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00189
Defendant:
Chief Deputy FNU Mancha, Sheriff Mike Griffis, Lt. Jesse Abalos and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gil v. Crockett et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Unknown Black Female Lt., Jeremy Chance, Latisha Baraka and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Rios et al
as 5:2019cv00451
Defendant:
Officer FNU Rios and Officer FNU Garcia
Plaintiff:
Humberto M. Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00703
Defendant:
Edith Doty, GEO Group, Inc., Captain FNU Kakovie and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quesinberry v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00704
Defendant:
Edith Doty, GEO Group, Inc. and Warden FNU Rios
Plaintiff:
Anthony Quesinberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krist v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00702
Defendant:
Edith Doty, GEO Group, Inc. and Warden FNU Rios
Plaintiff:
Joseph CM Krist, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talamantez v. Bexar County Sheriff et al
as 5:2016cv00012
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff, Deputy FNU Flores, Deputy FNU Rios and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Talamantez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dearmond v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Dearmond
Defendant:
United States of America, Karen Edenfield, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
