Cases 1 - 10 of 15
James v. Sperry et al
as 5:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
FNU Sperry, FNU Stevens and Coleman USP-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Finch v. Sperry et al
as 1:2019cv00242
Defendant:
Larry Feckle, Ben Jameson, FNU Sperry and others
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voelker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2019cv00182
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Voelker, Jr
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, FNU Sperry and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00205
Petitioner:
Randy S Scott
Respondent:
FNU Sperry and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rankin v. Al-Manza et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Elton Rankin, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Al-Manza, FNU Jennings, FNU Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. Sperry et al
as 1:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch
Defendant:
FNU Sperry, FNU Smith and FNU Slaypeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Winder et al
as 2:2016cv00885
Plaintiff:
Brent Mayon Cobb
Defendant:
James Winder, Scott Carver, Pamela Lofgreen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Salt Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
Salt Lake County Jail, Salt Lake County, James Winder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Salt Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00887
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
Salt Lake County Jail, Salt Lake County, James Winder and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Miguel Hinojosa v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 14-20232
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL HINOJOSA
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, FNU SPERRY, Assistant Warden, FNU SHEELY, Senior Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
