Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Martinez v. Zinnic et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Officer N. Zinnic, Officer FNU Wilson and Sgt. FNU Zemlica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Boller et al
as 6:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Hunter
Defendant:
Officer FNU Boller, Officer FNU Mitchell, Officer FNU Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk v. Massey et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, FNU Vonn, FNU Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Wise County Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Royce Wood
Defendant:
Wise County Detention Center, Lank Akin, FNU Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maynard v. Sowell et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cody Maynard
Defendant:
FNU Sowell, FNU Steffy, FNU Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Monk v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 5:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical, FNU Phipps, FNU Hillhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Anderson et al
as 5:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
LaQuince Hogan
Defendant:
Chandra Anderson, Wadley Regional Medical Center, Steward Stanley Management Company/CEO of Wadley Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lampkin v. Amonett et al
as 5:2021cv00270
Petitioner:
Esaw Lampkin
Respondent:
A Amonett, David Reed, FNU Mermea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiller v. Sellers et al
as 5:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Casey Ray Tiller
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, John Doe, FNU Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lampkin v. Amonett et al
as 1:2021cv00102
Defendant:
David Reed, FNU Dealgoto, FNU Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
