Cases 1 - 10 of 11
FORD v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. MORRIS, DET. I.C.J. PILIGNO, A. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. SCOTT
as 2:2023cv20426
Petitioner:
TODD C. FORD, JR.
Respondent:
MRS. BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FORD, JR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12435
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FORD, JR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FORD v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2022cv04500
Plaintiff:
MR. TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, OSCAR AVILLES, WELL PATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. NORTON et al
as 1:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
MR. TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
TPR T. R. NORTON, DET. I.C.J PILIGNO, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. WARDEN RICHARD SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv18863
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and WARDEN RICHARD SMITH
Plaintiff:
TODD FORD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. SMITH
as 1:2020cv17662
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD SMITH
Plaintiff:
TODD FORD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FORD v. SMITH
as 1:2020cv12655
Respondent:
WARDEN ROBERT SMITH
Petitioner:
TODD FORD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ARCHIE et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv07907
Defendant:
JODY HIRATA, RICHARD SMITH and CHARLES WARREN
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR., RAYMOND LAMAR BROWN, JOHN CLARK and others
Interested Party:
TARA D. SIMMONS-ARCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION v. Ford, Jr. et al
as 2:2016cv07773
Petitioner:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Respondent:
Donald C. Ford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
