Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Gonzales v. Bi-Mart Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Bi-Mart Corporation, Barry Bartholemew, Christopher Franco and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RN2 Enterprises LLC et al v. Horton et al
as 1:2019cv02037
Plaintiff:
RN2 Enterprises LLC, Nirav Patel and Neil Patel
Defendant:
Big Boots LLC, Robbie Lesa Horton, James Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montoya-Franco v. Bowser
as 2:2017cv01593
Respondent:
T. Bowser
Petitioner:
Adrian Montoya-Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franco D. Ferrua
as 3:2016ad00144
In Re:
Franco Dorian Ferrua
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Danielle Franco-Malone
as 3:2016ad00010
In Re:
Danielle Franco-Malone
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Franco v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 3:2015cv02076
Plaintiff:
Katherine Franco
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Adamski et al v. Schneider National, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
John Adamski and Robert Rogowski
Defendant:
Hector Franco, Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Schneider National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Franco v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2012cv01061
Plaintiff:
Jairo D. Franco
Defendant:
ITS Technologies & Logistics, LLC and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
