Cases 11 - 20 of 739
USA v. Vargas-Martinez
as 24-40028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franco Aniel Vargas-Martinez
USA v. Franco Posligua
as 24-40007
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christian Leonardo Franco Posligua
Coronel-Luna v. Garland
as 24-20
Petitioner:
JORDY CORONEL-LUNA, DIGNA FABIOLA FRANCO-MOROCHO, DANIELA MARIA FRANCO-FRANCO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Araujo Da Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4388
Petitioner:
GUILHERME ARAUJO DA SILVA, GIZELE FRANCO-VALADARES SILVA, LUIZA FRANCO-SILVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Silva Franco, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4014
Petitioner:
JHONATAS AMORIM SILVA FRANCO, GISLAINE FRANCO VALADARES AMORIM, BENHOUR FRANCO VALADARES AMORIM and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barstow Proprietor Association, et al. v. City of Barstow, et al.
as 23-3935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARSTOW PROPRIETOR ASSOCIATION, BALUBHAI G. PATEL, IRA GWIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BARSTOW, a municipal corporation, MEGHAN A. WHARTON and DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Banuelos Leon, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3595
Petitioner:
RUBEN BANUELOS LEON and ISIDRA FRANCO ORTIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Columbia Legal Services, et al. v. Stemilt AG Services, LLC
as 23-3548
Plaintiff:
MARGARITO FIERRO CORDERO, FERNANDO MENDEZ FRANCO, JOSE RODRIGUEZ LLERENAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEMILT AG SERVICES, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
COLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES, counsel for plaintiffs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
