Cases 11 - 20 of 22
MOBLEY v. SOWELL et al
as 5:2011cv00283
Plaintiff:
RAY CHRIS MOBLEY
Defendant:
MARK SOWELL, GREG PEEL and FRANK MCKEITHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOBLEY v. UNKNOWN CAPTAIN et al
as 5:2011cv00284
Plaintiff:
RAY CHRIS MOBLEY
Defendant:
UNKNOWN CAPTAIN, SAM DENHAM, GREG PEEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. MCKEITHEN
as 5:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
BERNARD PARKS
Defendant:
FRANK MCKEITHEN and RICK ANGLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Schmidt v. Frank McKeithen, et al
as 11-10748
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL K. SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK MCKEITHEN, Bay Co. Sheriff, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, J. B. DUNPHY, Florida Parole Commissioner and others
SCHMIDT v. MCKEITHEN
as 5:2010cv00331
Petitioner:
DANIEL K SCHMIDT
Respondent:
FRANK MCKEITHEN, BILL MCCOLLUM, J B DUNPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOBLEY v. CCA CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2009cv00342
Plaintiff:
RAY CHRIS MOBLEY
Defendant:
CCA CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, BCSO FRANK MCKEITHEN, GREG PEEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOBLEY v. MCKEITHEN
as 5:2009cv00332
Plaintiff:
RAY CHRIS MOBLEY
Defendant:
FRANK MCKEITHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JETER v. MEADOWS et al
as 5:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
KURTIS ROY JETER
Defendant:
STEVE MEADOWS, HALLOWAY, RICKY SEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JONES v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
FRANK JONES
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, FRANK MCKEITHEN and STEVE RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATTS v. SMITH et al
as 5:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
ROBIN DEMETRECE WATTS
Defendant:
MARK SMITH, DEBBIE ANDERSON, NEIL DELMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
