Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CLAY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ALBANY PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
CLAY v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
CLAY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ALBANY PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAY v. GEORGIA CRIMINAL INFORMATION CENTER
as 1:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA CRIMINAL INFORMATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ALBANY PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CLAY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ALBANY PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAY v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES
as 1:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
CLAY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ALBANY PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ALBANY PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CLAY v. SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION REVIEW BOARD
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WILLIS CLAY
Defendant:
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION REVIEW BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
