Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Warren v. Fraternal Order of Police Ohio Labor Council, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01655
Plaintiff:
Kimberlee Warren
Defendant:
Fraternal Order of Police Ohio Labor Council, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gales v. Charles et al
as 2:2021cv00328
Defendant:
Paul Pride, Cathy Brockman, Gwendolyn Callender and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Gales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 5:2019cv01255
Defendant:
City of Akron
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Local Lodge No. 139
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fraternal Order of Police Local 139, Summit County Deputies v. City of Akron, Ohio
as 5:2019cv01252
Defendant:
City of Akron
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Local Lodge No. 139
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Filing Error
as 5:2019cv01257
Defendant:
City of Akron
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Local Lodge No. 139
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ewelt v. Village of Brooklyn Heights et al
as 1:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
Vincent Ewelt
Defendant:
Village of Brooklyn Heights and Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 67
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Fraternal Order of Police, Akron Lodge #7 et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2015cv02112
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police, Akron Lodge #7 and Kevin Davis
Defendant:
City of Akron and James D. Nice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fraternal Order of Police Ohio Labor Council, Inc. et al v. Sheldon et al
as 1:2010cv01165
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Ohio Labor Council, Inc. and Mark E. Drum
Defendant:
J Steven Sheldon and Eric Bosko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
