Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1211
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO, JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, State Employee and others
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROBERSON et al v. HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC et al
as 2:2023mc00147
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY ROBERSON, REBECCA FREEMAN, BIANCA VIAS and others
Defendant:
HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC, FLORIAN EDUCATION INVESTORS LLC and STEVEN HART
Respondent:
Lighthouse Services LLC
Plumley v. Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Blue Apron Holdings, Inc., Jennifer Carr-Smith, Beverly K. Carmichael and others
Weiss v. Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Blue Apron Holdings, Inc., Jennifer Carr-Smith, Beverly K. Carmichael and others
USA v. Ryan Freeman
as 23-2869
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN LAMAR FREEMAN, also known as Suel
Fieni et al v. Freeman et al
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Fieni and Revive Medspa & Integrative Medicine
Defendant:
Emily Freeman and Simply Blessed Healthcare & Medspa PLLC
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC. v. WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
as 2:2023cv00208
Petitioner:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC.
Respondent:
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
