Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv02741
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Macias et al
as 4:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Avaro Covarrubias Perez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Macias, Correctional Officer L.Lopez, C. Koening and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Freeman v. Dudley et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Kyle Freeman
Defendant:
Dudley, R. Singh, E. Tardd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01206
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford v. Lt. B. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv08471
Petitioner:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Respondent:
B Perez, J Coleman, B Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanford v. Perez et al
as 3:2023cv04211
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Defendant:
Lt. B. Perez, J. Coleman, B. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Labson-Freeman et al
as 3:2023cv04221
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Beth Labson-Freeman, Edward C. Chen and Katherine N. Siereveld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman
as 4:2023cv03447
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. U.S. District Court et al
as 4:2023cv03305
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Beth Labson Freeman, Howard R. Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Felder v. Phillips
as 2:2023cv00895
Petitioner:
Freeman Allan Felder
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
