Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Prichard v. Mullet et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Jim Mullet, James Richardson, Garvin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarclay v. Averitt et al
as 5:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manquan Yarclay
Defendant:
L Averitt, Dr L Averitt, Ms K Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2020cv00726
Defendant:
William McCormick, Jennifer Turnage, Nicholas Gamble and others
Plaintiff:
Pao Xiong and Pao Hue Yeng Xiong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. Martin
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Jimmy Martin
Plaintiff:
Shawn Conrad Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cato v. Freeman et al
as 4:2019cv00594
Defendant:
Ciera Freeman and Brian Boeheim
Plaintiff:
Spencer Thomas Cato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan, III v. Eliott et al
as 6:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Shane Sampson, Ashley Aldrich, Kalup Philps and others
Plaintiff:
Freeman Buchanan, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2017cv00873
Plaintiff:
Pao Xiong
Defendant:
William McCormick, Nichols Gamble, Katie Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00757
Movant:
William Bernard Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
