Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Mosley v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02260
Petitioner:
Mr. Demetrius Mosley
Respondent:
Mr. Doug Williams, Judge Craig L. Schwall, T. Coun. Tawanna L. Payton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01504
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health Inc doing business as Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Yvette Fry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fry v. Ulrich et al
as 1:2019cv00194
Defendant:
Dr. Darlin Mao and Dr. Lane Ulrich
Plaintiff:
Verlon Fry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kissberg/Parker Fry JV, LLC v. The Hanover Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv01571
Plaintiff:
Kissberg/Parker Fry JV, LLC
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Max Blu Technologies, LLC v. Fry's Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00737
Defendant:
Fry's Electronics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Max Blu Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
SHAFFER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00459
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, DEBBIE OXLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WILLARD SHAFFER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Bryson et al
as 1:2018cv05459
Defendant:
John Doe, Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Willard Shaffer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Storr et al v. Rocket Farm Restaurants, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04375
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Storr and Jill Maddrell
Defendant:
Rocket Farm Restaurants, LLC and Ford Fry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Coggon et al v. Fry's Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03189
Plaintiff:
Edward P. Coggon and Michelle Coggon
Defendant:
Fry's Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WEST v. MOODY
as 7:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WEST
Defendant:
RAYMOND MOODY and FRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
