Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Engel v. ERDCC, et al
as 22-3087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center, CO1, CO2 and others
Joseph Thompson v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 22-2380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Leroy Thompson
Defendant / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe, Head Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, Michael Shewmaker, Deputy Warden, S. Farmer, Acting FUM and others
Joseph Engel v. Corizon, et al
as 22-1347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
Corizon, ERDCC, CO1 and others
Joseph Thompson v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 22-1118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Leroy Thompson
Defendant / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe, Head Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, Michael Shewmaker, Deputy Warden, S. Farmer, Acting FUM and others
Joseph Engel v. CO1, et al
as 22-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
CO1, CO2, Sergeant and others
Garner v. Precythe et al
as 5:2021cv06098
Plaintiff:
Frank Garner
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Brenda Fletchall, Ms. Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. CO1 et al
as 4:2020cv01923
Defendant:
Director, Assistant Warden, Director P&P and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. ERDCC et al
as 4:2020cv01827
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Att General, IPO ERDCC, P&P Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. ERDCC et al
as 4:2020cv01826
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Director, Major, IPO ERDCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
