Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Meany et al v. Atomic Protocol Systems OU et al
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Robert Meany, Graham Dickinson, John Briscoe and others
Defendant:
Atomic Wallet, Konstantin Gladych, Konstantin Gladyshev and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Williams v. Falk
as 1:2022cv01650
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williams, III
Defendant:
James Falk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willliams v. Falk
as 1:2022cv01574
Petitioner:
Clarence R. Willliams, III
Respondent:
James Falk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Falk v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2021cv02114
Plaintiff:
Chase Jordan Falk
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafoya v. Limon Correction Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00768
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Sergeant Melissa Piccione, Various John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carbajal et al v. Falk et al
as 1:2019cv01387
Defendant:
Martinez (I), Trujllio (I), Gary (I) Little and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Leal, Victoria Carbajal and Dean Carbajal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01290
Defendant:
Moore, Unknown Correctional Officers, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meads v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2019cv00309
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Marlar and James Falk
Plaintiff:
Alan Meads
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Falk et al
as 1:2019cv00054
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch, James Falk and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Petitioner:
Jermaine D. Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reyes v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00060
Respondent:
USA, Rick Raemisch and James Falk
Petitioner:
Luis Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
