Civil Rights Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Poindexter v. Haskell, Town of et al
as 6:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: Cheryl Poindexter
Defendant: Haskell, Town of, Steve Arrowood, Jessica Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Employment Discrimination Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00423
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00424
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00776
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00020
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00019
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Austin Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00002
Defendant: Christopher Born, Carmen Nickel, Brittany Garrett and others
Plaintiff: Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Bell v. Jackson, et al
as 6:2018cv00122
Plaintiff: Sylvanius Bell
Defendant: Nicky Jackson, Darryl Jackson, Kevin Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?