Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gulli v. Douglas County Family Court et al
as 1:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
Carmine Gulli
Defendant:
Douglas County Family Court, Robert Lowenbach, Lon Kopit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gulli v. Douglas County Family Court et al
as 1:2022cv02755
Plaintiff:
Carmine Gulli
Defendant:
Douglas County Family Court, Andrew Baum, Benjamin Figa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Family Court of Jerusalem, Israel
as 1:2022mc00012
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Family Court of Jerusalem, Israel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Assistance to foreign & international tribunals & litigants
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ysais v. Richardson, et al
as 09-2111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YNOSENCIO YSAIS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as Governor, State of New Mexico, MARY-DALE BOLSON, individually and in her capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the Department of Children Youth and Family, State of New Mexico, KAREN PRICE, individually and in her official capacity as Agency Head of Children Youth and Family, State of New Mexico and others
Ysais v. Richardson et al
as 1:2007cv00287
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ysais
Defendant:
Bill Richardson, Mary-Dale Bolson, Karen Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
