Cases 21 - 30 of 289
Fan Wu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 5:2022cv01711
Plaintiff:
Fan Wu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chen v. Missfresh Limited et al
as 1:2022cv04065
Plaintiff:
Juan Chen, Maso Capital Investments Limited and Chelsea Fan
Defendant:
Missfresh Limited, Zheng Xu, Jun Wang and others
Petitioner:
Blackwell Partners LLC - Series A, Star V Partners LLC, Bingzheng Mao and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00817
Plaintiff:
Daffern, Brycen Daffern, David Dahl and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Fan v. Grab Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2022cv03277
Plaintiff:
Si Fan
Defendant:
Grab Holdings Limited, Anthony Tan and Peter Oey
USA v. Fan Yang
as 22-11030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FAN YANG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ZHAO et al v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
XUE JIAO ZHAO, XUAN LIN, FAN LIN and others
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Foran v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Mark Foran
Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alfred Poor and others
Saee v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10462
Plaintiff:
Ali Saee
Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alf Poor and others
MacMillan v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10265
Plaintiff:
Aiden MacMillan
Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alfred Poor and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ali Saee
Consolidated Defendant:
Jim Cassano, VIA Motors International, Inc. and Longboard Merger Sub, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
