Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plummer v. Fedex Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv03415
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Plummer
Defendant:
Fedex Corporation and Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Power Seller NYC., Inc. v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv03288
Plaintiff:
Power Seller NYC., Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation, Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. and Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tirado et al v. Master Express Incorporated et al
as 1:2008cv04322
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Tirado and Johnny Colon
Defendant:
Master Express Incorporated, Zaki Shipping Services Inc., Fedex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meader et al v. FEDEX Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00897
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Meader and Carole V. Meader
Defendant:
FEDEX Corporation and John Doe Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Debose v. Fedex Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv07042
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Debose
Defendant:
Fedex Corporation, Joanne Bourne and Herman Prawl
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meteor AG v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv03773
Plaintiff:
Meteor AG
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation, FedEx, Fedex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
