Cases 41 - 50 of 133
John Doe v. William P. Barr et al
as 2:2020cv03434
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Christopher A. Wray, WILLILAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Railey v. Lynch et al
as 3:2020cv00353
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Railey
Defendant:
Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Department of Justice, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner et al v. San Francisco Public Library et al
as 3:2019cv08194
Plaintiff:
Tomika Gardner and Mamadoo Kane
Defendant:
SFMTA - Muni Bus/Train, SFPD, San Francisco Public Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tsepo Brian Nyambe v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 5:2019cv02176
Plaintiff:
Tsepo Brian Nyambe
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romano v. Unknown Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Agents et al
as 3:2019cv07172
Defendant:
Unknown Richmond Police Department Officers, Unknown Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Agents, Richmond CA, Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tene Carr v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2019cv09112
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Federal Bureau of Investigation and Doe Defendants
Plaintiff:
Tene Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carr v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2019cv09093
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Plaintiff:
Tene Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
