Cases 1 - 10 of 36
ROSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JEFFERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv04882
Plaintiff:
HENRY A JEFFERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELANSARI v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 2:2020cv03593
Petitioner:
AMRO ELANSARI
Respondent:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, THE WEST GOSHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEGENS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 2:2020cv00971
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DAVID M. HARDY
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ANGELO DEGENS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Stiso v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 3:2018cv02375
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigations
Plaintiff:
Pasquale Stiso
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CURRENT v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2017cv05385
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, RONALD B. TURK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CURRENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. SONG
as 2:2017mc00674
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
BANKS v. COCAS et al
as 2:2017mc00673
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONOVAN COCAS, ADRIAN N. ROE, MCKEE and others
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017mc00632
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00619
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
