Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Gimbel v. United States et al
as 3:2011cv05503
Plaintiff:
John Gimbel
Defendant:
United States, State of California, U.S. Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gimbel v. United States et al
as 1:2011cv05503
Plaintiff:
John Gimbel
Defendant:
United States, State of California, U.S. Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06688
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walter E Floyd v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 2:2011cv04141
Defendant:
Broadhead, Dr. Evelyn Castro, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Walter E. Floyd, Jr
Austin et al v. Lange et al
as 3:2010cv04551
Plaintiff:
Ronald Austin and Deborah Austin
Defendant:
Matthew Lange, Cornell Correction Center and U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin et al v. Lange et al
as 4:2010cv04551
Plaintiff:
Ronald Austin and Deborah Austin
Defendant:
Matthew Lange , Cornell Correction Center and U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. PRISONS et al
as 1:2009at00932
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WARDEN RIOS and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Richter v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv01845
Plaintiff:
Allen P. Richter
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Prison Camp, Atwater, D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cecilia Murillo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv06644
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Murillo
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
