Cases 31 - 40 of 77
SMITH v. FDC OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04907
Plaintiff:
GENE CORNELL SMITH
Defendant:
FDC OF PHILADELPHIA, MERLAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KEITH v. (BOP) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2016cv01774
Petitioner:
ROBERT KEITH
Respondent:
(BOP) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GARRETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2016cv01603
Plaintiff:
ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, F.B.O.P., THE KINTOCK GROUP HALFWAY HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PLYTAS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2016cv01259
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER PLYTAS, JR.
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KEITH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2015cv04771
Petitioner:
ROBERT KEITH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PAMIAS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2015cv04008
Plaintiff:
SAMMY PAMIAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE, FEDERAL DEFENDERS DISTRICT OF N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIELDS v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2015cv02455
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KEVIN FIELDS
Defendant:
DAVID ORTIZ, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FRANKEL v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2015cv00656
Petitioner:
MARTIN FRANKEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HENDERSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON
as 2:2014cv06413
Petitioner:
MARCUS HENDERSON
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. KRUGER et al
as 2:2014cv05748
Petitioner:
ARTHUR BROWN
Respondent:
J. E. KRUGER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
