Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Cofield v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv01261
Petitioner:
Keenan K. Cofield
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Baltimore Co. Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01178
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCarthy v. US Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2010cv03075
Plaintiff:
William McCarthy
Defendant:
US Dept of Justice, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and FCI Cumberland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foreman v. Unnamed Officers of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 8:2009cv02038
Plaintiff:
Orlando Foreman
Defendant:
Unnamed Officers of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorham-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 8:2009cv01166
Plaintiff:
Edna Gorham-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and U.S. Marshal Service et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 8:2009cv00895
Petitioner:
James Cedric Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Harold Watts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gorham-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 8:2009cv00585
Plaintiff:
Edna Gorham-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Marshall Service, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02494
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02330
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02213
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
