Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Campbell v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institution Ottisville, New York et al
as 7:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Richard Campbell
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison-Otisville Federal Correctional Institution, Warden W.S Piller, JOHN 1-10 DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Gage v. FCI Otisville Federal Correctional Institution et al
as 7:2022cv07810
Plaintiff:
Anwar L. Gage
Defendant:
FCI Otisville Federal Correctional Institution, Warden W.S. Plirer, Clemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. The United States of America
as 1:2014cv06488
Defendant:
Robert Beaudouin, M.D., Michael Borecky, M.D., Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Wilfred King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brown v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv07937
Petitioner:
Samuel Brown
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pack v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution at Ray Brook
as 9:2011cv00908
Petitioner:
Anthony Pack
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Correctional Institution at Ray Brook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Herrera v. Federal Correctional Institution, Miami et al
as 1:2010cv04522
Plaintiff:
Virigilio Herrera
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution, Miami and Kenneth Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Melendez v. Shoemaker et al
as 1:2008cv06661
Plaintiff:
Luis Melendez
Defendant:
Shoemaker, Federal Correctional Institution, Unknown Mailroom Officer(s) and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kimley v. Killian et al
as 1:2008cv04385
Petitioner:
Edward Kimley
Respondent:
Janice M. Killian, Federal Correctional Institution Otisville, NY and J. Petrucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
