Cases filed in Washington
Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Boards of Trustees of the Northwest Ironworkers Health and Security Fund et al v. North Coast Iron Corp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00945
Plaintiff: Boards of Trustees of the Northwest Ironworkers Health and Security Fund , Northwest Ironworkers Employers Vacation Trust , Northwest Ironworkers Retirement Trust and others
Defendant: North Coast Iron Corp , M.A. Mortenson Company, Federal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Webb et al v. American Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas et al
as 3:2016cv05931
Plaintiff: Vincent Webb and Marlon Recreational Products Ltd.
Defendant: American Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas , Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London , Federated Insurance Company of Canada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Pyrotek Incorporated v. Central National Insurance Company of Omaha et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00322
Plaintiff: Pyrotek Incorporated
Defendant: Central National Insurance Company of Omaha , St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company , Travelers Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
United States of America et al v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05575
Plaintiff: United States of America and Brooklyn Iron Works Inc
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Co, Federal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. R.E.P. Electric, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05425
Defendant: R.E.P. Electric, Inc., Coburn Contractors, LLC , Hartford Fire Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: United States of America and North Coast Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Garcia et al v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01995
Plaintiff: Garrett Garcia and Derek Hume
Defendant: ADT Security Services, Inc and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ash Grove Cement Company v. Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv00931
Plaintiff: Ash Grove Cement Company
Defendant: Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company , American Home Assurance Company, American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
United States of America f/b/o PSW Electric, Inc. v. Watts Constructors, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv05809
Plaintiff: United States of America f/b/o PSW Electric, Inc.
Defendant: Watts Constructors, LLC , Granite Construction, Inc. , Watts-Granite A JV and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Elcon Corporation v. Turner Construction Company et al
as 2:2013cv01727
Plaintiff: Elcon Corporation
Defendant: Turner Construction Company , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America , Federal Insurance Company and others
Thirdparty_defendant: The Port of Seattle
Thirdparty_plaintiff: The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania , Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Counter_claimant: The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania , Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Counter_defendant: Elcon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
X2 Biosystems, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01653
Plaintiff: X2 Biosystems, Inc.
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?