Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
New York Legal Assistance Group, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2022cv05928
Plaintiff: New York Legal Assistance Group, Inc.
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Georgia, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 21-14269
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Defendant / Appellant: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE and AMERICAN PSYCHIATRICS INSTITUTE
American Civil Liberties Union et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 1:2021cv10430
Plaintiff: ACLU, ACLU Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union and others
Defendant: United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
KY, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6147
Plaintiff / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF TENNESSEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS and others
Angelica Clark, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-35560
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT EVANS and GARRISON DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security
Defendant: JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie, GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES and others
Western States Center, Inc., et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-35949
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SARA D. EDDIE, an individual, KARIN A. POWER, Oregon State Representative, an elected official, JANELLE S. BYNUM, Oregon State Representative, an elected official and others
Marilu Touma v. EEOC, et al
as 20-56126
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, 1 through 10, Inclusive, EEOC EMPLOYEE, 1, 2, 3, PARADOM, Unknown officer name and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARILU F. TOUMA
Adam Strege v. Unknown Parties, et al
as 20-1951
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES #4, Grand Rapids, MI Police Officers, GERALD A. CALVIS, FBI Agent, UNKNOWN PARTIES #3, Grand Rapids, MI Social Security ALJ ODAR Employees and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM STREGE
LEOPOLD et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv02508
Plaintiff: JASON LEOPOLD and BUZZFEED INC.
Defendant: OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LEOPOLD et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv02179
Plaintiff: JASON LEOPOLD and BUZZFEED INC.
Defendant: GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?