Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Morgan v. Lebron-Olazagasti et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey K. Morgan
Defendant:
Juan Lebron-Olazagasti and FedEx Custom Critical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Howard v. Elrac, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10686
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rahim Howard
Defendant:
FedEx Custom Critical, Inc., Mark Ferrari, ELRAC, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Leonard Mondile
Cross Claimant:
SNL Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Cobuzzi v. Ballister et al
as 7:2022cv02844
Plaintiff:
Brian A Cobuzzi
Defendant:
Wilfred Ballister and FedEx Custom Critical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Calcano-King v. Goulette et al
as 1:2021cv08059
Plaintiff:
Lilian Calcano-King
Defendant:
Gary Michael Goulette and Fedex Custom Critical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm
Canales v. Clergyman et al
as 3:2020cv00368
Defendant:
Hector Randy Clergyman and Fedex Custom Critical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Canales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beerbahadur v. Fedex Custom Critical, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07282
Plaintiff:
Sandra Beerbahadur
Defendant:
Fedex Custom Critical, Inc. and Jackie Spradlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Cover Note B0509JC492812 v. FedEx Custom Critical, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01934
Plaintiff:
Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Cover Note B0509JC492812
Defendant:
FedEx Custom Critical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Wendy Thompson
Defendant:
Ian Ansmem Thomas and Fedex Custom Critical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Sanofi Pasteur Inc. v. FedEx Custom Critical, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02893
Plaintiff:
Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
Defendant:
FedEx Custom Critical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
