Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hamilton, John v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
John Hamilton
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., RNC Deliveries Inc., Meng Vang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 2:2020cv01311
Plaintiff:
Brandi N Johnson
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. FedEx Ground Package Systems Inc
as 2:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brandi Johnson and Fairway Delivery Inc
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fairway Delivery Inc v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 2:2020cv00114
Plaintiff:
Fairway Delivery Inc
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EJP Delivery v. FedEx Ground
as 2:2018cv00828
Plaintiff:
EJP Delivery
Defendant:
FedEx Ground
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hollister, Marty v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00258
Plaintiff:
Marty Hollister
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Ruiz Efrain Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks Jay Transportation, Inc. v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Brooks Jay Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kreft v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00951
Plaintiff:
Joanette D Kreft
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation , FedEx Ground Package System Inc , Santiago Murillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Johnson v. Palmer et al
as 2:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Willie J Johnson
Defendant:
Jim Palmer and FedEx Ground Package System Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00610
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
