Cases
Goldberg et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv24746
Plaintiff: Osama Makram Wahny Guirguis, Lorne Morris, Qiang Wu and others
Defendant: Sarah Kendall, Kenneth T (Ken) Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv04013
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Complete Sports Medicine PTY LTD., Hong Wei Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv03989
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Francefaguo, Cui Quanjian and others
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jewell v. MOL Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09493
Plaintiff: Wayne Jewell
Defendant: MOL Global, Inc. , Tan Sri Dato' Seri Vincent Tan, Ganesh Kumar Bangah and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Grodko et al v. MOL Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09397
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Grodko
Defendant: MOL Global, Inc., Ganesh Kumar Bangah, Allan Sai Wah Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Freedman v. MOL Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09357
Plaintiff: Michael Freedman
Defendant: MOL Global, Inc. , Ganesh Kumar Bangah, Allan Sai Wah Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SKRIPCHENKO et al v. VIRxSYS CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv00004
Plaintiff: YELENA SKRIPCHENKO , BENYAN ASEFA , LAN FEI CHANG and others
Defendant: VIRxSYS CORPORATION, SIGNATURE CAPITAL, LLC, WILLIAM J TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?