Cases 1 - 10 of 569
Feng v. Kelai Corp.
as 24-979
Plaintiff:
SHANGGANG FENG, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
KELAI CORP., d/b/a Jef Chinese, FAN YANG, JAY HUANG and others
An v. Despins
as 24-914
Plaintiff:
TAO AN, CHUNGANG GUAN, CUI QINGYUAN and others
Defendant:
LUC A. DESPINS and PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Gomez Cruz et al v. Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02657
Plaintiff:
Jose Reynaldo Perez, Jose Esposorio Gomez Cruz, Junior and others
Defendant:
Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC doing business as Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC and He Shun Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Feng v. Garland
as 24-336
Petitioner:
WEISING FENG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. 1039 Echols Drive, Frisco, Texas, 75306
as 2:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1039 Echols Drive, Frisco, Texas, 75306
Claimant:
Feng Chen and Tianqiong Xu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
