Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wideman v. Innovative Fibers LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Parker O'Neil Wideman
Defendant:
Innovative Fibers LLC and Stein Fibers LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Douglass et al v. Innovative Fibers LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
William F Douglass and Jessica L Douglass
Defendant:
Innovative Fibers LLC and Stein Fibers LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Draper v. Innovative Fibers LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Riley C Draper
Defendant:
Innovative Fibers LLC and Stein Fibers LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crown Castle Fiber LLC v. Charleston, City of
as 2:2020cv02692
Defendant:
Charleston, City of
Plaintiff:
Crown Castle Fiber LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv01788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ACE American Insurance Company et al v. Rayonier Performance Fibers LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01741
Plaintiff:
ACE American Insurance Company and Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rayonier Performance Fibers LLC and Meadwestvaco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Cytec Carbon Fibers LLC et al v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2011cv00217
Plaintiff:
Cytec Carbon Fibers LLC and Cytec Engineered Materials Inc
Defendant:
Jonathan Hopkins , R&H Investments LLC , H&H Construction & Development Inc and others
Counter_claimant:
Carolina Construction Management Consultant and Sewell W Crisman, IV
Counter_defendant:
Cytec Carbon Fibers LLC and Cytec Engineered Materials Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
American Synthetic Fibers LLC v. Nevown Inc
as 6:2008cv03875
Plaintiff:
American Synthetic Fibers LLC
Defendant:
Nevown Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
