Cases 41 - 50 of 79
TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01640
Plaintiff:
KELLEE TAYLOR
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , ATLANTA RESTAURANT PARTNERS. LLC, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON-FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS-STRIPLIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS-STRIPLIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DIRECTOR OF FBI WASHINGTON DC FIELD OFFICE, FBI POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
S&S INVESTMENTS, LLC v. NEAL et al
as 1:2017cv00796
Plaintiff:
S&S INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
NATHAN A. NEAL, PATRICK HORRELL, EDWARD S. COHN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BUFFALO FIELD CAMPAIGN et al v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2016cv01909
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS , WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and BUFFALO FIELD CAMPAIGN
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL , DANIEL M. ASHE and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
FIELDS v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01430
Plaintiff:
ANDRE FIELDS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
FIELDS v. USA
as 1:2016cv01319
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
THOMAS FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RENEAU et al v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2016cv00966
Plaintiff:
SUSAN RENEAU , ROBERT FIELDS , MARVIN KASCHKE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DANIEL M. ASHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
FIELDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Petitioner:
SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
