Cases 1 - 10 of 56
425 Potters Road LLC et al v. Erie Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
425 Potters Road LLC and Just Like That LLC d/b/a Potters Field Restaurant & Pub
Defendant:
Erie Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06470
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Emrit v. Special Agent in Charge of FBI Field Office in Southern District of New York (SDNY)
as 1:2022cv00822
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Special Agent in Charge of FBI Field Office in Southern District of New York (SDNY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LoRusso v. Wray et al
as 6:2022cv06293
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Defendant:
Director Patrick Wray and Federal Bureau of Investigation, Tampa Field Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Petitioner:
Damion G.V Davis
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Secretary of The Department of Homeland Security, ICE Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
