Cases 11 - 20 of 182
Mata-Arrevalo v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02433
Petitioner:
Eliel Mata-Arrevalo
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and Atlanta Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ordonez v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Ordonez, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dodge v. Fikes et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Austin Dodge
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Warden Jeffrey Fikes
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Jeffrey White
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis, Jr. v. Carmarillo, et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jr., J. Carmarillo, P. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Fikes et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Kenneth Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00039
Petitioner:
Bobby Edwards
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
James Richard Dudley
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figueroa-Gibson v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Carlos Figueroa-Gibson
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chmiel v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Michal M. Chmiel
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
