Cases 31 - 40 of 475
Davis, Jr. v. Carmarillo, et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jr., J. Carmarillo, P. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Fikes et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Kenneth Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00039
Petitioner:
Bobby Edwards
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
James Richard Dudley
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fike v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv17585
Plaintiff:
Donald Fike
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Figueroa-Gibson v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Carlos Figueroa-Gibson
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chmiel v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Michal M. Chmiel
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Okafor v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Nzelo Okafor
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Murray v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00020
Petitioner:
Romario Murray
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. Robert Fike
as 23-10350
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT FIKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
