Cases 21 - 30 of 330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Floyd v. Kimball International, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03922
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Kimball International, Inc., Patrick E. Connolly, Susan B. Frampton and others
Floyd v. Glass et al
as 1:2023cv03770
Plaintiff:
Cashondra Floyd
Defendant:
Noah Glass, Brandon Gardner, Colin Neville and others
Nominal Defendant:
Olo, Inc.
Floyd et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03331
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Floyd and Sarita Floyd
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodgers et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03100
Plaintiff:
Nancy Rodgers and Floyd Rodgers
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Walker et al v. New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Carlton Walker and Jermell Mclean
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Brian Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frias v. Aeroclean Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10826
Plaintiff:
Robert Frias
Defendant:
Aeroclean Technologies, Inc., Amin J. Khoury, M.D. David Helfet and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
