Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 384
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff: RICKEY BENSON
Defendant: FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff: Wendolyn Lee
Defendant: Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Drane v. Michelle Floyd
as 24-1257
Petitioner: JAMES TYRELL DRANE
Respondent: MICHELLE FLOYD
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff: Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant: Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Miles v. Michelle Floyd
as 24-1096
Petitioner: JASON MICHAEL MILES
Respondent: MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Hudson v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02072
Petitioner: Melvin Hudson
Respondent: Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byrd et al v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02043
Plaintiff: Laquita Byrd and Marcus Byrd
Defendant: Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr.
as 24-5043
Petitioner: RICKEY BENSON
Respondent: FLOYD BONNER, JR., Sheriff
Benson v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02789
Plaintiff: Rickey Benson
Defendant: Floyd Bonner, K. Fields, Shelby County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joiner v. State of Tenn. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02778
Plaintiff: Antonio Labaron Joiner
Defendant: State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?