Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRIS et al v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2019cv00886
Defendant:
MURIEL ELIZABETH BOWSER, KFIR GAMLIEL, DOUGLAS SCOTT MEYER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRIS and DAVID HARRIS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MUSCOGEE CREEK INDIAN FREEDMEN BAND, INC. et al v. ZINKE et al
as 1:2018cv01705
Plaintiff:
N.K., RHONDA K. GRAYSON, SHARON LENZY-SCOTT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, JAMES FLOYD and RYAN ZINKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
ADAMS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2014cv00433
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
NELDA MARTINEZ, CARLOS VALDEZ, FLOYD SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Donald Jones v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 10-7124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Bobby Jindal, Governor, State of Louisiana, Sue P. Everhart, Republican Party of Louisiana and others
JONES v. JINDAL et al
as 1:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
BOBBY JINDAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, SUE P. EVERHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES et al v. SCHAFER
as 1:2008cv02220
Plaintiff:
MARY JAMES, BEN ALLEN, ROOSEVELT GATERS and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AGEE et al v. SCHAFER
as 1:2008cv00882
Plaintiff:
MARY LEE AGEE, RONNIE ALDRIDGE, VERLENE ALSTON and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
