Cases
In Re Subpoena to Thomas Horstemeyer, LLP
as 1:2023cv04966
Respondent: Thomas Horstemeyer LLP
Petitioner: In Re Subpoena to Thomas Horstemeyer, LLP, Dynatemp International, Inc., Fluorofusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. and others
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. Dynatemp International, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff: RMS of Georgia, LLC doing business as CHOICE Refrigerants
Defendant: Dynatemp International, Inc., Fluorofusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. and Kivlan and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA, et al
as 23-1104
Petitioner: RMS of Georgia, LLC
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: FluoroFusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc.
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Dynatemp International, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00057
Defendant: FluoroFusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Harold B. Kivlan, IV, William Gresham and others
Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Dynatemp International, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00193
Defendant: FluoroFusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Harold B. Kivlan, IV, William Gresham and others
Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
R421A LLC v. Dynatemp International, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00147
Defendant: IGAS USA, Inc., BMP USA, Inc., Harold B Kivlan and others
Plaintiff: R421A LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Dynatemp International, Inc. et al v. RMS of Georgia, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00142
Plaintiff: Dynatemp International, Inc. and FluoroFusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc.
Defendant: RMS of Georgia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?