Cases 1 - 10 of 11
David Wang v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv07385
Petitioner:
FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC., a New York corporation
Plaintiff:
David Wang
Defendant:
Does ONE through TEN inclusive, Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and Foot Locker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foot Locker Inc. et al v. Capri Urban Baldwin LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04275
Defendant:
Capri Urban Baldwin LLC, Does and Professional Security Consultants
Plaintiff:
Foot Locker Inc. and Foot Locker Specialty Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dexter Gaines v. Baldwin Hills Crenshaw, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv05130
Defendant:
Baldwin Hills Crenshaw, LLC, Does, Foot Locker Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Gaines
Gilbert Paul Hernandez et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
as 2:2015cv06486
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company, Does, Foot Locker Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Hernandez, Gilbert Paul Hernandez, Richard Michael Hernandez and others
Gravity Defyer Corporation v. Under Armour Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01842
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc, BackCountry.Com, Inc., Champs Sports Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gravity Defyer Corporation
Brown et al v. Foot Locker Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02731
Plaintiff:
Hallie Brown , David Cheatham, Jr. , Eric Guzman and others
Defendant:
Foot Locker Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eric Guzman v. Foot Locker Inc et al
as 5:2010cv01496
Defendant:
Does, Foot Locker Inc and Foot Locker Retail Inc
Plaintiff:
Eric Guzman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
