Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Davis v. Ansari, et al
as 23-6040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHADID ANSARI, GEO/LCF Medical Director, individually and in his official capacity, GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity and others
Foote v. Williams
as 1:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Foote, Jr
Defendant:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hart v. Foot Locker Corporation
as 2:2021cv01135
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Foot Locker Corporation, Dick Johnson, Rick Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foote v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2020cv03700
Petitioner:
Brandon Foote
Respondent:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. GEO Group Corrections, et al
as 17-6059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity, HECTOR RIOS, JR., Warden, individually and in his official capacity and others
Foote v. Cozza Rhodes
as 1:2015cv02705
Petitioner:
Stanley Foote
Respondent:
T.K. Rhodes-Cozza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderton v. Anderson et al
as 2:2012cv01088
Plaintiff:
Ray Anderton
Defendant:
Lyle Anderson, Vivian Anderton, Stephen Foote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glazier v. Foote et al
as 2:2012cv00306
Plaintiff:
Tyrel Orson Glazier
Defendant:
Stephen D. Foote, George M. Harmond and Grant H. Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ockert v. Roberts et al
as 5:2010cv03058
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Ockert
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, (fnu) Foote, (fnu) Chastain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foote v. Parker et al
as 5:2009cv00219
Petitioner:
Travis Foote
Respondent:
David Parker and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
