Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parekh v. Avalara Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Vineet Parekh and Martin Sohovich
Defendant:
Avalara Inc, Scott Mcfarlane, Bruce Crawford and others
DiMarco et al v. Coates et al
as 2:2020cv01396
Plaintiff:
John F Dimarco and Joseph Serpente
Defendant:
Coates Innovations LLC doing business as Support The Foot and Lori Coates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America, et al v. Safeco Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2018cv00452
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ellen M. McCracken, U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company, Shapiro & Sutherland LLC, K. Sutherland and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
United States of America v. Cravens et al
as 2:2015mc00143
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lorraine Lee Cravens
Garnishee:
Best Foot Forward LLC
United States of America v. Riojas et al
as 2:2015mc00013
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Riojas
Garnishee:
Ankle and Foot Specialist of Washington, PS
MUSIC Group Services US, Inc. v. Foote
as 2:2013cv02271
Plaintiff:
MUSIC Group Services US Inc
Defendant:
David Foote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Foote v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05489
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Gregory S Foote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
In the Matter of the Complaint of Blake S Sedlacek as Owner of a certain 18.8 foot Sea Ray Pleasure Boat
as 2:2009cv01063
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Blake S Sedlacek as Owner of a certain 18.8 foot Sea Ray Pleasure Boat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller et al v. Foote et al
as 2:2008cv00215
Plaintiff:
Sherrill Miller and Richard Higginbotham
Defendant:
Dean L Foote, II and Christine Foote
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv05472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
